GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 12.0 points higher (42.1 vs 30.1) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 30.1 | −28.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 28.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $1,190.42 | −52.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 52.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 107.91s | 51.29s | −52.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 52.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 28.5% less intelligence, 52.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill