GPT-5 mini (High) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 21.6 points higher (38.4 vs 16.8) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $189; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 38.4 | +128.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $1,607.86 | +752.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 8.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.72s | 25.73s | −56.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 56.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GPT-5 mini (High): 128.6% more intelligence, 752.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5 mini (High)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill