GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 19.9 points higher (50.2 vs 30.3) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $319; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 30.3 | −39.6% Beam 1.0 is 39.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $318.73 | −38.9% Beam 1.0 is 38.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.44s | 8.02s | −81.5% Beam 1.0 is 81.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 39.6% less intelligence, 38.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill