GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 3.4% more intelligence, 50.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 36.0 | +3.4% Muse Ember (Max) is 3.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $237.91 | $117.12 | −50.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 50.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.11s | 10.09s | −16.7% Muse Ember (Max) is 16.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill