GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 10.3 points higher (52.4 vs 42.1) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 42.1, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when 42.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 52.4 | +24.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 24.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $5,786.78 | +2210.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 23× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.46s | 46.63s | +274.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 274.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 24.5% more intelligence, 2210.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 274.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill