GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 10.3 points higher (46.3 vs 36.0) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($389 vs $117; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 36.0 | −22.2% Muse Ember (Max) is 22.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $388.57 | $117.12 | −69.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 69.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.17s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 22.2% less intelligence, 69.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill