GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 37.0 points higher (51.0 vs 14.0) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $216; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 14.0 | −72.5% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 72.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $215.93 | −67.4% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 67.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 170.50s | 5.81s | −96.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 96.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 72.5% less intelligence, 67.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill