GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 13.1 points higher (51.0 vs 37.9) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $110; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 37.9 | −25.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $109.55 | −83.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 83.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 49.53s | −42.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 42.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 25.7% less intelligence, 83.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill