GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 4.7 points higher (51.0 vs 46.3) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $207; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 46.3 | −9.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 9.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $206.66 | −68.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 68.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 114.99s | 49.69s | −56.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 56.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 9.2% less intelligence, 68.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill