GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 8.3 points higher (51.0 vs 42.7) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.1-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 42.7 | −16.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 16.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $283.18 | −57.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 57.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 143.74s | 21.66s | −84.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 84.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 16.3% less intelligence, 57.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill