GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 32.7 points higher (51.8 vs 19.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $545; both premium class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 19.1 | −63.1% LongCat 2.0 is 63.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $544.74 | −49.6% LongCat 2.0 is 49.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 224.19s | 35.69s | −84.1% LongCat 2.0 is 84.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 63.1% less intelligence, 49.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)LongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill