GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 5.8 points higher (43.9 vs 38.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Max).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 38.1 | −13.2% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 13.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $122.05 | −48.8% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 48.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 97.71s | +775.5% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 775.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 13.2% less intelligence, 48.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 775.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill