GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 22.4 points higher (43.9 vs 21.5) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $10.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 21.5 | −51.0% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 51.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $10.63 | −95.5% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 95.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 7.07s | −36.6% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 36.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 51.0% less intelligence, 95.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill