GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Ling 3.0 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 23.8 points higher (43.9 vs 20.1) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $89.8; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ling 3.0 Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Ling 3.0 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 20.1 | −54.2% Ling 3.0 Flash is 54.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $89.77 | −62.4% Ling 3.0 Flash is 62.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 12.90s | +15.6% Ling 3.0 Flash is 15.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.07 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 54.2% less intelligence, 62.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ling 3.0 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Ling 3.0 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill