GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 1.2 points higher (30.6 vs 29.4) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $111; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling 2 Small when you need intelligence above 29.4, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 29.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.4 | 30.6 | +4.1% Inkling 2 Small is 4.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $111.16 | $791.81 | +612.3% Inkling 2 Small is 7.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.18s | 20.92s | +155.7% Inkling 2 Small is 155.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Inkling 2 Small vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 4.1% more intelligence, 612.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 155.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Inkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill