GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 51.7% less intelligence, 27.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 260.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 17.5 | −51.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 51.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $145.77 | +27.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 27.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 24.42s | +260.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 260.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill