GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 16.2 points higher (52.4 vs 36.2) but costs 41× as much to run the benchmark ($4711 vs $115; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 52.4 | +44.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 44.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $4,710.87 | +4013.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 41× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 43.09s | +535.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 535.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 44.8% more intelligence, 4013.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 535.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill