GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-28.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 5.2 points higher (43.3 vs 38.1) but costs 28× as much to run the benchmark ($5414 vs $190; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 38.1, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when 38.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 43.3 | +13.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 13.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $190.36 | $5,414.45 | +2744.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 28× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.35s | 43.65s | +493.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 493.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 13.6% more intelligence, 2744.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 493.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill