GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 0.1 points higher (30.6 vs 30.5) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $213; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling 2 Small when you need intelligence above 30.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 30.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.5 | 30.6 | +0.3% Inkling 2 Small is 0.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $213.33 | $791.81 | +271.2% Inkling 2 Small is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.33s | 20.92s | +185.4% Inkling 2 Small is 185.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Inkling 2 Small vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 0.3% more intelligence, 271.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 185.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Inkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill