GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 32.7 points higher (45.4 vs 12.7) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $111; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 12.7 | −72.0% Granite 4.2 30B is 72.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $110.83 | −69.6% Granite 4.2 30B is 69.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 63.69s | +238.4% Granite 4.2 30B is 238.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 30B vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 72.0% less intelligence, 69.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 238.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill