GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 0.9 points higher (46.3 vs 45.4) but costs 9.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3473 vs $365; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 45.4, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when 45.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 46.3 | +2.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $3,473.49 | +851.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 9.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 51.23s | +172.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 172.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 2.0% more intelligence, 851.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 172.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill