GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 11.2 points higher (45.3 vs 34.1) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($400 vs $95.7; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.1, and Muse Ember (Xhigh) when 34.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.3 | 34.1 | −24.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 24.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $400.18 | $95.73 | −76.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 76.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 84.45s | 7.89s | −90.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 90.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 24.7% less intelligence, 76.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill