GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 5.4 points higher (48.1 vs 42.7) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 42.7 | −11.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 11.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $283.18 | −68.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 68.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 83.46s | 22.76s | −72.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 72.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 11.2% less intelligence, 68.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill