GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 17.8 points higher (48.1 vs 30.3) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $209; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 30.3, and Beam 1.0 when 30.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 30.3 | −37.0% Beam 1.0 is 37.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $208.52 | −77.1% Beam 1.0 is 77.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 83.46s | 7.09s | −91.5% Beam 1.0 is 91.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 37.0% less intelligence, 77.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill