GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 1.5 points higher (52.4 vs 50.9) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $2925; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (High).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 52.4 | +2.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $5,786.78 | +97.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 97.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.44s | 41.43s | −8.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 8.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 2.9% more intelligence, 97.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill