GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 3.1 points higher (45.8 vs 42.7) but costs 5.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 42.7 | −6.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 6.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $283.18 | −81.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 81.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.56s | 21.66s | +72.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 72.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 6.8% less intelligence, 81.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill