GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 2.8 points higher (52.4 vs 49.6) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $2434; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (Medium).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 52.4 | +5.6% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 5.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $3,802.98 | +56.2% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 56.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.16s | 176.59s | +1147.1% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 1147.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 5.6% more intelligence, 56.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1147.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-6-astra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-6-astra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill