GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 6.5% less intelligence, 104.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 226.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 46.4 | −6.5% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 6.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $4,967.35 | +104.1% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.07s | 45.88s | +226.1% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 226.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill