GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 32.1 points higher (49.6 vs 17.5) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 17.5 | −64.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 64.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $145.77 | −94.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 94.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.07s | 24.79s | +76.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 76.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 64.7% less intelligence, 94.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill