GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 11.3 points higher (52.4 vs 41.1) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $1015; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 41.1, and Ling 3.1 Flash when 41.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 41.1 | −21.6% Ling 3.1 Flash is 21.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $1,014.56 | −73.3% Ling 3.1 Flash is 73.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 163.27s | 13.66s | −91.6% Ling 3.1 Flash is 91.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 21.6% less intelligence, 73.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Ling 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill