GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 41.6 points higher (52.4 vs 10.8) but costs 36× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $105; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 10.8 | −79.4% Mercury 2 is 79.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $104.94 | −97.2% Mercury 2 is 97.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 158.33s | 6.58s | −95.8% Mercury 2 is 95.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2 vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 79.4% less intelligence, 97.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill