GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 26.2 points higher (52.4 vs 26.2) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $1165; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 26.2, and Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when 26.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 26.2 | −50.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $1,164.93 | −69.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 69.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 181.54s | 56.02s | −69.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 69.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 50.0% less intelligence, 69.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill