GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 0.3 points higher (52.7 vs 52.4) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $3803; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 52.4 | −0.6% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 0.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $3,802.98 | −28.6% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 28.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 388.52s | 188.57s | −51.5% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 51.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 0.6% less intelligence, 28.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/gpt-6-astra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/gpt-6-astra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill