GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 6.4 points higher (52.7 vs 46.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $3881; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (High).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 46.3 | −12.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 12.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $3,880.88 | −27.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 27.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 275.53s | 25.34s | −90.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 90.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 12.1% less intelligence, 27.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill