GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 8.8 points higher (52.7 vs 43.9) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1552; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 43.9, and Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when 43.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 43.9 | −16.7% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 16.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $1,551.81 | −70.9% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 70.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 280.51s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 16.7% less intelligence, 70.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill