GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 33.6 points higher (52.7 vs 19.1) but costs 9.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $545; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 19.1, and LongCat 2.0 when 19.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 19.1 | −63.8% LongCat 2.0 is 63.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $544.74 | −89.8% LongCat 2.0 is 89.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 285.78s | 37.06s | −87.0% LongCat 2.0 is 87.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 63.8% less intelligence, 89.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)LongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill