GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 6.4 points higher (52.7 vs 46.3) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 46.3 | −12.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 12.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $206.66 | −96.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 96.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 275.53s | 48.29s | −82.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 82.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 12.1% less intelligence, 96.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill