GPT-6 Luna (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 33.7% less intelligence, 29.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 235.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 21.8 | −33.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 33.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $61.93 | +29.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 29.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.43s | 41.73s | +235.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 235.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-6 Luna (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill