GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 7.3 points higher (40.2 vs 32.9) but costs 66× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $47.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 40.2 | +22.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 22.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $3,172.37 | +6529.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 66× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.41s | 62.08s | +190.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 190.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 22.2% more intelligence, 6529.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 190.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Luna (High)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill