GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 4.3 points higher (25.8 vs 21.5) but costs 93× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $10.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 25.8 | +20.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 20.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $992.88 | +9240.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 93× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 46.75s | +608.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 608.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 20.0% more intelligence, 9240.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 608.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill