GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 4.7 points higher (34.6 vs 29.9) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($66.8 vs $31.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Medium).
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 34.6 | +15.7% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 15.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $66.81 | +114.3% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 21.27s | +157.8% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 157.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 15.7% more intelligence, 114.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 157.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/gpt-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/gpt-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill