GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 25.2 points higher (55.1 vs 29.9) but costs 100× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $31.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 29.9, and GPT-6 Luna (Medium) when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 55.1 | +84.3% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 84.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $3,117.31 | +9901.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 100× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 42.64s | +416.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 416.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 84.3% more intelligence, 9901.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 416.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill