GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 25.1 points higher (29.9 vs 4.8) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($31.2 vs $12.2; both budget class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 3B.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 4.8 | −83.9% Ministral 3 3B is 83.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $12.23 | −60.8% Ministral 3 3B is 60.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 3.07s | −62.8% Ministral 3 3B is 62.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 83.9% less intelligence, 60.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill