GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Medium)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 11.4% less intelligence, 806.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 26.5 | −11.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 11.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $282.51 | +806.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 9.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.33s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill