GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Medium)
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 1.3% less intelligence, 7205.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 29.5 | −1.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 1.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $2,277.12 | +7205.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 73× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.63s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill