GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 40.0% less intelligence, 177.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 688.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 11.1 | −40.0% Granite 4.2 8B is 40.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $53.07 | +177.0% Granite 4.2 8B is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.98s | 39.25s | +688.2% Granite 4.2 8B is 688.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Granite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill