GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 49.7% less intelligence, 129.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 104.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 9.3 | −49.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 49.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $43.98 | +129.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.09s | 10.43s | +104.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 104.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill