GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) scores 13.7 points higher (23.1 vs 9.4) but costs 18× as much to run the benchmark ($936 vs $53.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 9.4, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 9.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.4 | 23.1 | +145.7% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.14 | $936.36 | +1662.1% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 18× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.25s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 145.7% more intelligence, 1662.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) scores 18.60 for $39.6.
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 4 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill