GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 62.2% less intelligence, 535.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 151.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 7.0 | −62.2% Mistral Small 3.2 is 62.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $121.78 | +535.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.98s | 12.50s | +151.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 151.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill