GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Max) scores 12.5 points higher (36.0 vs 23.5) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($117 vs $85.7; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Ember (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.5 | 36.0 | +53.2% Muse Ember (Max) is 53.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $85.74 | $117.12 | +36.6% Muse Ember (Max) is 36.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.60s | 10.09s | −76.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 76.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 53.2% more intelligence, 36.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 24.60 for $72.7.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill